Connected intelligence / 4 records

Residential targeting

Follow the connections. Research and analysis, brought together in one place.

CB-090registered

Command Brief

The database, not the scanner

Your Palm Is in Two Databases

A fingerprint reader on a door captures one trait at one moment, but the reading is enrolled into stores that are increasingly linked, breached, brokered or queried. This brief asks which biometric stores hold a principal's records, who governs each, and what lever exists to remove a template when the holder changes. Built from operators' own published figures for national, forensic and vendor systems. For family offices weighing which enrollments to accept.

BiometricsBreach & Leaked DataData Brokers

2026-06-01View record

CB-097registered

Command Brief

The trait you cannot recall

You Never Took a DNA Test

A stolen fingerprint is a credential problem, and that frame is routinely applied to DNA, where there is no genomic login to defeat. This brief asks what threat a principal's genome actually poses, including exposure through a relative's test and a sample that arrives somewhere the principal never was. Built from peer-reviewed genetic genealogy and forensic research and dated cases. For family offices whose principals never took a DNA test.

BiometricsMisidentificationBreach & Leaked Data

2026-06-01View record

CB-098registered

Command Brief

When voice stopped being proof

Amazon's Replacement for a Voiceprint

Two large cloud providers have retired their stand-alone speaker verification services just as cloned voices became cheap and convincing. This brief asks what a voice can still prove on its own, where a principal's enrolled voiceprints may still be in use, and what should be layered beside them. Built from vendor retirement notices, a broadcast test of cloned voices against financial institutions and industry analysis. For principals and family offices.

BiometricsSynthetic Identity & PersonasPretexting & Scams

2026-06-01View record

CB-099registered

Command Brief

The gap is the price of a workable definition

The Law Carves Out Pupil Dilation

Five states have written neural data into their privacy statutes, and each draws a limit on what counts, one of them naming pupil dilation and motor activity as outside it. This brief asks why those limits exist, what falls outside them, and what that means for a principal exposed through wearables and headsets. Built from the statutes, their legislative analyses and federal proposals as of September 2026. For counsel and family offices tracking neural and biometric privacy.

Privacy Law & RegulationBiometricsData Brokers

2026-06-01View record